PopMuda Post 4: Why we work with Youth. How we work with Youth.


mypopin:

There are far too many ‘Youth’ branded organizations and events presently which make the very word seem overrated at times. The burning question is, are they appealing to the real demographics of youth of today? Let alone engaging them successfully to make changes. The history of youth movement here is very much apparent dating back to pre-independence. They are the ‘conscience’ of society, if you may call it. Youth democracy awareness is rather closely associated with partisan politics in this country. To certain extend, this is thought as the only way to participate in the process of nation building. The truth is, there are many youths out there who would want to make a difference and need to feel their views appreciated. However, they would like to achieve this without joining any political parties. Ideally, they should be able to voice out their concerns creatively through music, film, visual art, writings, theatre, forums and many more avenues out there. How do you engage millions of youth of the world using a common space and platform today at real time? You guessed it. The social networking and media phenomenon is indeed changing the world as we speak. But most of us are very aware of how appealing it can be. But how can we use these tools effectively to actually shift the paradigm? Youths are indeed a very unpredictable lot. Their needs and appeals dynamically changes by the minute that it makes it very difficult to please. So how do we get their attention?

Here in .myFuture Foundation, we listen to youths carefully. Identify their preferences and satisfy their requests. We create projects that will be based on what will appeal to them and work to get the message out there. After all, they want to be heard and be significant in the society. Our partnership with Popfolio has brought you this fast growing social networking/media project, PopIN. Our approach is simple, effective and expandable. Engage the youths using pop culture while pushing socio-politics matters. It sounds experimental but that’s the beauty of it.

We believe that there are two types of youth in Malaysia. The obvious - Those who choose to know and they may want to participate actively or become an observer. The oblivious - Those who choose not to know but would love to express themselves in other preferred ways. It is the foundation’s role to engage both types in order for them to be heard. My previous PopMuda posts has revealed that it is possible to spread the message of life, humanity, race-relations and nation building through the avenues of music, film and sports. Not everything needs to be academically done. The society that binds us may prevent us being a democratically mature youth but believing that we will grow soon means we have got 70% of the job done. .myFuture Foundation is always on the lookout to work with youths and hear them out.

So do visit us at www.myfuturefoundation.my

Will the Youths of Malaysia get to this maturity of democracy one day? It’s entirely up to you. Make it happen.

http://www.ukyouthparliament.org.uk

Kharis Idris
Director
.myFuture Foundation

PopMuda 3: From Rugby to Golf to Cycling to Triathlon.


mypopin:

My stint in rugby had left me with strings of injuries that forced me out of competitive events for good. With an acute back pain, there was not much to be done. My weight ballooned to 120kg and I desperately needed a hobby. I chose golf (?). Despite having 4 golfers chasing after one tiny ball throughout the entire 18-hole golf course, it’s actually an enjoyable game to play. Golfing requires a lot of skill and time. A socialite’s game. This was before social networking sites came along, of course. I probably shed 3kg from all the huffs and puffs around the course. Smoking, that is. Plus you don’t have to be an expert to know that a golf swing isn’t actually great for an ailing back too.

I can’t quite remember how I quit golf for cycling. But I do remember it feels exactly the same when you’re riding your bicycle as a child. I sold my golf set to fund the purchase of a used road bike. I couldn’t fit into a cycling jersey at that time so I put on a football jersey instead. I was conned into a 50km ride to Putrajaya one night and took 3 hours to complete the ride. I did a 3-day, 400km ride that took me through 3 states and never looked back since. I did a fair share of racing and organized races for fellow friends. At the peak of my avidness, I rode an average of 200km per week and shedding 20kg off my weight. Then it all came to a halt when I got busy with my wedding and subsequently having our first child after. It’s difficult to restart after having stopped for quite some time. I went on the bike several times only to feel a bit depressed trying to get the old form without success. I resorted to being a food-hunter on the bike. My rides would be worked around the good places to eat, off the beaten track, in and out of kampungs. I (still) have the intention to write a photo-journo book on this soon. Needless to say, the weight came creeping back.

Being around triathlete friends, I have always thought that they’re crazy to be doing the sport. And I really thought they were absolutely mindless to do the Ironman in Langkawi every year which requires them to swim 3.8km in the open water, then bike around the island 180km and to top it all off, run a full marathon of 42km before coming to the finish line. You’re given 17 hours to complete all that. I had a first hand experience to witness all of them beating every odd to finish their race by their own abilities and sheer human willpower. I was in awe of a great spectacle and quietly asked myself if I could do it? The first task is to get myself running and the problem is I hate running. Being overweight doesn’t make it easier to run, either. I enrolled myself into a 11km run event to kickstart myself. I walked mostly and came to the finish line at 2 hours, feeling absolutely destroyed. Strangely, that feeling kept me going and brought me to the KL Half-Marathon. A 3 hours ordeal through the undulating path in the city centre is no easy feat but I finished it. I also started to swim regularly again and participated in the PD Triathlon which would require me to swim 1.5km, bike 40km and run 10km. It wasn’t easy. It was painful. But I kept on going. Then you have friends back tracking the route, cheering you up to the finish line. That is priceless. Nothing beats that. And for that very reason, I will be doing my first full marathon of 42km in Singapore this Sunday.

To me, it is a measure of the human physical and mental (mostly) ability to finish what you started. It’s a journey quite closely associated to life itself. And the great thing about Triathlon, is that EVERYONE can do it. If this fat bloke can do it, why can’t you? I’m advocating this to the masses right now. Yes, a Tri4U. Would you willing to give it a try if there’s an event in much shorter distances? Would you do it if you can just walk in the pool, if you can’t swim? Use any type of bicycle and even walk instead of running? I can’t promise you it will be easy. But I can promise you that same feeling most of us feel when you reach the finish line.

If you think you can’t possibly be doing all this. Watch his clip and think again.

http://www.teamhoyt.com/

Kharis Idris
Director
.myFuture Foundation

PopMuda Post 2: The other disease that comes with AIDS


mypopin:

It’s World Aids Day today. Since I don’t have a red ribbon to wear, I have changed my Twitter photo to wear one. You can get yours too, here. http://bit.ly/5YATny. I am in solidarity w the 33.4 million people living with HIV. In Malaysia since 1986, a total of 84,630 HIV infections have been reported and 11,384 people have died from AIDS as at December 31, 2008 (http://www.mac.org.my/). I’m not going to talk on how HIV/AIDS are transmitted. There are millions of information on the Internet that you can find. If ever at all you’re interested to know. I much rather speak about another ‘disease’ that comes together with it.

Since the beginning of the HIV/AIDS epidemic over 25 years ago, STIGMA has been a barrier to HIV prevention and care. The effect of stigma on people’s ability to access HIV testing, counseling, diagnosis, care, treatment, and prevention messages varies from setting to setting, but when present, stigma can create an environment where people may avoid HIV-related services (http://www.hivaidsstigma.org/). The general perception towards HIV positive people is that they have been promiscuous or a drug addict. It’s no secret that we live in a very judgmental society and our values are based on moral actions. Since they’re morally ‘wrong’, the HIV is God’s punishment to them? Sad, really. Ask yourself this question : “Would you disown wife/child/mother/father/siblings/friends when you find out they’re HIV positive?” Now, ask yourself this. “Would you like to be disowned if you find out you’re HIV positive?”. Because the TRUTH is, EVERYONE is vulnerable to HIV/AIDS. Although, not as vulnerable as the Influenza A H1N1 virus or Diabetes or even Heart Disease which has far more cases in Malaysia. The modern medical science has an answer today by offering effective treatments for HIV positive people to live longer and healthier.

Although, HIV test is compulsory for Muslim couples prior to their marriage, I strongly feel that this regulation has to be made voluntary. It is a responsibility for each and everyone of us to our spouses, children, family, friends and the society. Get tested and be knowledgeable. For it is the only way for us to prevent this epidemic from spreading even further.

On this day too, I would like to pay tribute to my all-time favourite band, Queen. As we all know, the legendary vocalist, Freddie Mercury died of AIDS in 1991 at the height of his career. Freddie was scheduled to sing at the Opening Ceremony of the Barcelona Olympics in 1992 with Montserrat Caballé, a Spanish opera singer. He left a string of legacy and great songs of our time (including those about humanity and politics). His death also marked an important milestone in the fight for AIDS as the remaining members of Queen founded the Mercury Phoenix Trust and organized the Freddie Mercury Tribute Concert for AIDS Awareness in 1992 at Wembley Stadium. The concert was reminiscent of Queen’s greatest live performance at the Live Aid Concert at the same venue in 1985.

Excerpt of Freddie’s last audio interview:

“You’re the last person I’m talking to, so you’ll probably get the best interview, darling. I don’t want to change the world. For me, happiness is the most important thing and if I’m happy then it shows in my work. In the end, all the mistakes and all the excuses are down to me. I like to feel that I’m just being my honest self and as far as I’m concerned I just want to pack in as much of life and fun, having a good time as much as I can within in the years I have. Well there you are, you have it on tape. Use it. Well that’s the nearest I’ve come to a lot of passion in terms of interviews. How much more have you got? Come on, I’m getting bored.”

(also included with one of his last written songs, “In My Defence”.

Here are clips of Queen’s performance at Live Aid, dubbed their greatest live performance of all time.

Barcelona by Freddie Mercury & Montserrat Caballe

Innuendo by Queen. Very political lyrics.

Kharis Idris
Director
.myFuture Foundation

PopMuda Post 1: Of Rugby & ‘Invictus’


mypopin:

Back in school, I turned my attention towards Rugby. In those days, rugby played in urban schools was no match against the boarding school teams. They have a rich history of rugby and the sense of camaraderie that only can be nurtured when you live as a unit. I went on to university and started playing more seriously that brought me to competitive club level. It is here where I learned the true beauty of the sport. Despite the rough nature of the game, it is the most gentlemanly sport, in my opinion. The winner will line up to congratulate the defeated at the end of the game. No other sport shows this respect to the opponents.

Rugby remains one of the most intellectual team sport in the world where every movement or set pieces in gameplay is thought of. It’s very strategic. You just don’t barge or bulldoze towards the opponent. There is a reason why you do so. There is discipline involved with the many laws of the game that I can’t even seem to keep up till today. The ultimate goal is to bring the ball to your opponent’s try line by always moving forward. In the process, you go through a series of obstacles being tackled by your opponent, rucking, mauling and scrumming. Passing the ball in the forward direction is an offence so you have to pass it to your side where your teammates are waiting and the process resumes. This was the essence of rugby. Teamwork. A human calculation that ensures victory.

There is a beauty in the game of rugby that translates to life itself. History showed that rugby was able to change a whole nation. In 1995, South Africa hosted the Rugby World Cup. It was a time of change when former President Nelson Mandela took the office after being released from prison. He needed to find a way to unite the much divided people of his country and called upon the Captain of the South Africa team (Springboks), the legendary Francois Pineaar to help him. Below is a trailer from the upcoming movie Invictus, directed by Clint Eastwood. Starring Morgan Freeman (as Mandela) and Matt Damon (Francois Pineear). I’ve also a included an interview clip of Francois Pineear speaking about Mandela. Be inspired.

Kharis Idris
Director
.myFuture Foundation

Allah


(Originally published in Amin Iskandar’s column in The Malaysian Insider, Jan 5, 2010)

JAN 5 — Satu ketika dahulu semasa saya masih lagi di bangku sekolah rendah, dalam kelas Pendidikan Islam, ustazah sering menyuruh kami sekelas berzikir 99 nama-nama Allah yang juga dikenali sebagai Asma ul Husna.

Secara kebetulan pada ketika itu jika menonton televisyen, sebelum masuk waktu Maghrib, zikir Asma ul Husna seringkali dimainkan. Rasa tenang jiwa apabila mendengarkan zikir 99 nama-nama Allah tersebut.

Tidak tahu pula sama ada masih ada zikir Asma ul Husna dimainkan di televisyen sebelum waktu Maghrib masakini oleh kerana saya sendiri sudah lama tak menonton televisyen.

Pada 31 Disember 2009, Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur telah membuat keputusan untuk mengenepikan larangan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) terhadap penggunaan perkataan “Allah” oleh akhbar “The Herald” terbitan gereja Katolik.

Keputusan ini mengundang pelbagai reaksi. Ahli Parlimen Kulim Bandar Baru, YB Zulkifli Noordin mengumpamakan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur itu seperti kes Natrah yang berlaku pada tahun 1950an dulu.

“Keputusan itu mengingatkan saya kembali kepada kes Natrah @ Maria Hertough pada tahun 1950 dimana Mahkamah penjajah Inggeris dimana Hakimnya yang bukan Islam telah, dalam keputusannya membatalkan keislaman Natrah dan perkahwinannya kepada Almarhum Mansor Adabi, langsung tidak mengambil kira perundangan syariah dan sensitiviti umat Islam semasa itu. Akhirnya tercetuslah rusuhan dan huru hara yang tidak membawa menafaat kepada sesiapa pun”. (zul4kulim.blogspot.com)

Ketua Pembangkang negeri Selangor, Datuk Seri Dr Khir Toyo menganggap keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur itu sebagai padah akibat daripada perpecahan orang-orang Melayu dari segi politik. Malahan Dr Khir turut menggangap keputusan mahkamah tersebut sebagai mengenepikan hak agama Islam sebagai Agama Persekutuan.

“Keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi membenarkan pendakwah Kristian di negara ini menggunakan nama Allah sebagai terjemahan daripada ‘God’ dalam risalah dakwah berbahasa Melayu mereka sangat menyedihkan dan pada hemat saya mengenepikan kedudukan Islam sebagai Agama Persekutuan.

“Sungguhpun masih ada ruang rayuan, namun keputusan ini menunjukkan satu isyarat kepada orang Melayu dan Islam bahawa segala status quo orang Melayu dan agama Islam di negara ini boleh berubah pada bila-bila masa bila ada orang Islam sendiri menjadi pengkhianat dan menyokong kumpulan yang mahu melemahkan kedudukan Islam di negara ini”. (www.drkhir.com)

Menteri Besar Kelantan, Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat menyifatkan tidak salah bagi penganut agama Samawi bagi menggunakan kalimah Allah. Akan tetapi beliau bimbang jika perkataan “Allah” disalahgunakan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu. Oleh itu beliau mencadangkan agar pimpinan Islam mengadakan rundingan dengan pemimpin agama Kristian mengenai isu tersebut.

Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam, YB Khalid Samad mengatakan bahawa Al-Quran sendiri mempunyai banyak ayat-ayat yang menunjukkan bahawa orang bukan Islam menggunakan perkataan “Allah” apabila memaksudkan Tuhan semesta alam.

“Al-Quran sendiri mempunyai banyak ayat-ayat yang menunjukkan bahawa orang bukan Islam, samada golongan musyrikin, Yahudi mahupun Nasrani menggunakan perkataan ‘Allah’ apabila mereka memaksudkan Tuhan semesta alam. Maka, sekiranya kita ingin menentukan hukum berhubung persoalan ini, Al-Quran adalah rujukan pertama. Sekiranya Al-Quran sendiri mengiyakannya, bagaimana kita hendak menafikannya? Di mana hendak kita simpan ayat-ayat yang mengatakan orang bukan Islam juga menggunakan perkataan Allah untuk memaksudkan Tuhan semesta alam seperti ‘Wa Kaalatil Yahudu Uzair ibnu Llah’ yang bermaksud ‘Dan berkata orang-orang Yahudi Uzair adalah anak Allah’?” (www.khalidsamad.com).

Bekas Mufti Perlis, Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin menyatakan bahawa tidak salah jika manusia ingin memanggil Tuhan dengan nama Allah oleh kerana Allah adalah tuhan yang sebenar. Akan tetapi beliau tidak bersetuju jika berhala dinamakan Allah.

“Ya, manusia memang patut memanggil Tuhan dengan panggilan Allah. Itulah Tuhan yang sebenar. Sebelum kedatangan Nabi Muhammad SAW pun, nama Allah telah digunakan untuk memanggil Tuhan. Namun meletakkan nama tersebut dengan tujuan menghina adalah patut ditentang. Ini seperti jika menulis nama Allah pada berhala”. (www.drmaza.com)

Setelah membaca pandangan-pandangan daripada ahli-ahli politik dan bekas mufti, saya cuba untuk mendapatkan pandangan-pandangan daripada dua orang anak muda Melayu-Islam yang mempunyai latarbelakang pendidikan dan profession yang berbeza.

Yang pertama ialah Kharis Idris, anak muda berkelulusan universiti tempatan yang kini bekerja sebagai Pengarah kepada My Future Foundation.

Amin Iskandar:  Pandangan saudara mengenai keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur membenarkan penggunaan perkataan Allah oleh penerbitan Katolik, The Herald?

Kharis Idris: Ini satu hal yang “trivial” serta remeh mengenai teknikal bahasa dan bukannya keagamaan. Allah merupakan terjemahan Arab untuk Tuhan. God merupakan terjemahan English untuk Tuhan. Di negara timur tengah, penganut-penganut Kristian juga menggunakan Allah bagi merujuk kepada Tuhan. Malahan turut menggunakan perkataan “Sabda”.

Di Indonesia juga Allah diterima sebagai rujukan kepada Tuhan bagi penganut agama Kristian. Sebenarnya tidak ada masalah dalam isu ini melainkan penguasa Islam di Malaysia tidak bermuzakarah dengan Melayu-Islam di sini supaya Islam itu menuju kearah progresif dalam era globilasasi.

Ini adalah masalah utama Umat Islam di Malaysia. Seringkali terperangkap dengan perkara yang remeh temeh. Bila orang bukan Islam menggunakan kalimah Allah, mereka marah. Bila anak muda sambut tahun baru, mereka marah dan mengatakan bahawa itu adalah tahun baru orang kafir. Akan tetapi Umat Islam di Malaysia masih lagi mengamalkan rasuah, merompak, merogol dan membunuh. Sepatutnya perkara yang lebih besar begini yang patut dibisingkan.

Amin Iskandar: Keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi tersebut telah menimbulkan kemarahan segelintir pihak. Zulkifli Nordin, Ahli Parlimen PKR menyifatkan keputusan mahkamah itu umpama isu Natrah yang menyinggung sensitiviti umat Islam. Tun Dr Mahathir, Khir Toyo dan Mukriz Mahathir juga menentang keputusan mahkamah ini secara terbuka dan menyifatkan keputusan mahkamah tersebut sebagai tidak peka kepada perasaan Umat Islam di Malaysia. Apa komen saudara?

Kharis Idris: Soal sensitiviti dan kononnya tidak mahu umat Islam di negara ini keliru bukanlah perkara pokok. Perkara ini perlu di ambil langkah yang rasional dan penerangan yang terperinci perlu dilakukan.

Bukan dengan cara mengharamkan atau membuat sekatan apabila terdapat isu sebegini. Tindakan ini akan menyebabkan umat Islam lebih keliru. Tidak perlu kenyataan dari ahli politik kerana ianya menjurus kepada mempolitikkan keadaan.

Amin Iskandar: Sebagai seorang anak muda Melayu-Islam professional, apa yang saudara ingin jelaskan kepada masyarakat terutamanya majoriti orang-orang Melayu mengenai penggunaan perkataan “Allah” bagi bukan Islam?

Kharis Idris: Penerangan dan diskusi mengenai sejarah penggunaan perkataan “Allah” perlu dilakukan. Golongan muda perlu menjadi lebih rasional dan bukannya emosional disamping perlunya menjadi orang yang berpengetahuan dan bukannya hanya melatah seperti golongan tua. Dunia sedang memerhatikan dan mungkin juga sedang ketawa melihat Muslim di Malaysia membesar-besarkan isu remeh temeh sebegini.

Berikut pula adalah pandangan daripada Zulhazry Mohd Yusoff, seorang graduan daripada Timur Tengah yang fasih berbahasa Arab. Beliau kini berkerja sebagai penterjemah di sebuah negara di Timur Tengah.

Amin Iskandar: Beberapa hari lalu, Mahkamah Tinggi telah membuat keputusan bahawa larangan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) terhadap penggunaan perkataan ‘Allah’ adalah tidak sah. Dengan ini akhbar The Herald  dalam versi Bahasa Melayunya dibenarkan untuk menggunakan perkataan “Allah” sebagai terjemahan kepada “God” atau Tuhan. Apa komen saudara?

Zulhazry Mohd Yusoff: Perkataan Allah itu sebenarnya pun bukan milik bahasa Melayu jadi apakah hak Kementerian Dalam Negeri untuk menafikan hak satu pihak lain untuk menggunakan perkataan Allah?

Faktor utama ialah terjemahan God itu sendiri tapi apakah Allah itu merujuk kepada Allah bagi orang Islam? Itu secara umum jika kita merujuk sudut terjemahan. Ia hanya sekadar terjemahan maksud tetapi bukannya makna.

Allah di dalam Bible merujuk kepada Father, Son and Holy Spirit, manakala Allah di dalam Al Quran pula merujuk kepada Allah Yang Esa, yang juga mempunyai 99 nama yang lain. Sangat mudah, bagi yang faham atau pun bagi mereka yang tidak faham langsung.

Amin Iskandar: Keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi tersebut telah menimbulkan kemarahan segelintir pihak. Zulkifli Nordin, Ahli Parlimen PKR menyifatkan keputusan mahkamah itu umpama isu Natrah yang menyinggung sensitiviti umat Islam. Tun. Dr. Mahathir, Khir Toyo dan Mukriz Mahathir juga menentang keputusan mahkamah ini secara terbuka dan menyifatkan keputusan mahkamah tersebut sebagai tidak peka kepada perasaan Umat Islam di Malaysia. Apa komen saudara?

Zulhazry Mohd Yusoff: Mengapa umat Islam di Malaysia harus tersinggung sedangkan perkataan Allah itu bukan hak milik mutlak orang Islam, apatah lagi bangsa Melayu.

Mungkin mereka merasakan, jika God diterjemah sebagai Allah, maka ia seperti merampas Allah atau pun memaksa mereka berkongsi Allah sedangkan itu sudah merujuk kepada sudut akidah dan perinciannya secara ringkas kita tidak berkongsi apatah lagi Tuhan kita dirampas.

Perlu diingat, Yahudi, Nasrani dan Islam adalah tiga agama langit dan kita berkongsi pelbagai perkara yang melibatkan para Rasul, akidah, ibadat dan sebagainya.

Jika sekiranya kita sensitif dengan isu ini, bagaimana pula dengan terjemahan Jesus yang merujuk kepada Nabi Isa a.s? Sewajarnya Nasrani mempunyai hak ke atas “perkataan” Isa kerana Injil diturunkan terlebih dahulu sebelum Al Quran.

Jangan samakan dengan isu Natrah kerana ia melibatkan rampasan fizikal dan akidah seorang makhluk. Jangan sombong dan bongkak, kerana agama Islam bukan milik orang Melayu sahaja dan bahasa Arab juga bukan milik orang Islam sahaja.

Amin Iskandar: Dikatakan bahawa gereja-gereja di Lubnan dan Mesir menggunakan perkataan “Allah” merujuk kepada tuhan. Apakah pernah timbul bantahan daripada Umat Islam disana? Apakah Umat Islam disana pernah terkeliru dengan penggunaan Allah sebagai tuhan bagi penganut Kristian?

Zulhazry Mohd Yusoff: Sepanjang pengetahuan saya, belum pernah timbul sebarang bantahan yang melibatkan isu perkataan ini. Mereka faham, ia adalah bahasa Arab, jadi ia bukan milik mutlak umat Islam, kerana bahasa Arab itu sudah wujud sebelum kedatangan Nabi Muhamad s.a.w lagi.

Kekeliruan juga rasanya tidak pernah timbul kerana ia seperti mendengar seorang penganut Kristian memberikan salam yang menjadi satu perkara normal di Jordan, Lebanon, Syria dan Mesir. Apatah lagi mereka memang berbahasa Arab, jadi tiada sebab mereka melihat menyebut Allah itu sebagai sesuatu yang meragukan.

Jika yang berucap ketika sambutan Hari Natal itu seorang paderi, maka Allah itu bukanlah merujuk kepada Tuhan umat Islam. Begitulah sebaliknya. Jadi, jika kamu membaca akhbar The Herald dan bertemu dengan perkataan Allah, maka kamu perlu tahu bahawa itu adalah penerbitan milik Kristian dan sudah pasti ia tidak merujuk kepada Allah Yang Esa.

Amin Iskandar:  Apakah nasihat saudara kepada Umat Islam di Malaysia berhubung dengan penggunaan perkataan “Allah” bagi penganut Katolik dalam penerbitan The Herald  dalam bahasa Melayu?

Zulhazry Mohd Yusoff: Jangan menyalahkan orang lain atas kelemahan diri kita sendiri. Saya faham jika umat Islam di Malaysia bimbang sekiranya “Allah” itu terpaksa dikongsi dengan Kristian dan sekaligus akan menyebabkan kekeliruan pembaca, khususnya mereka yang kurang arif dengan ilmu agama, walaupun secara asas.

Mereka bimbang dengan Kristianisasi, mereka bimbang sekiranya selepas ini dakwah Kristian akan lebih mudah disebarkan seiring dengan penerbitan berbahasa Melayu, apatah lagi perkataan Allah digunapakai untuk merujuk kepada terjemahan God.

Sebenarnya begini, mengapa tidak umat Islam di Malaysia, pihak yang berwajib dalam bidang agama Islam di Malaysia, mencermin diri sendiri terlebih dahulu. Mengapa mereka tidak memperluaskan dakwah Islam itu secara lebih intensif dan komprehensif.

Bagaimana pendekatan mereka dalam membawa umat Islam kembali semula kepada ajaran Islam yang sebenar dan bukan sekadar taklid, bukan sekadar agama yang diwarisi. Jika pemahaman umat Islam telah sekian lama kukuh, pasti tidak timbul isu-isu sebegini. Jika mereka boleh menerbitkan risalah dakwah di dalam Bahasa Melayu, mengapa tidak kita terbitkan seribu risalah dakwah dalam bahasa Inggeris, Tamil, Mandarin dan sebagainya?

Terjemahan Al Quran yang mahu dibuat di dalam bahasa Iban pun ditolak, kumpulan saudara baru dibiarkan tanpa perhatian sehingga mereka kembali semula kepada agama asal, penerapan konsep tajdid (pembaharuan) di dalam Islam juga ditolak dan pelbagai karenah birokrasi lain. Mereka hanya berkokok ketika isu sebegini muncul sedangkan pada waktu lain, ketika mereka sepatutnya aktif mendepani pembangunan rohani umat Islam di Malaysia, suara mereka langsung tidak kedengaran.

Begitulah serba sedikit pandangan-pandangan mengenai isu Allah. Cadangan saya, jika ada orang-orang Islam yang marah atau merasa terancam dengan penganut agama Katolik menggunakan perkataan Allah, mulakanlah memenuhkan masjid dan surau pada setiap waktu solat. Terutamanya solat Subuh.

Begitu juga solat Zohor, Asar, Maghrib dan Isyak. Jangan biarkan masjid hanya penuh pada solat Jumaat. Adalah satu pembaziran membiarkan masjid dan surau kosong dan marah apabila kerajaan tak buat masjid dan surau. Jika umat Islam di Malaysia sentiasa memenuhkan masjid pada setiap waktu solat, maka itu adalah satu isyarat bahawa Islam itu kuat di Malaysia. Jika ini tidak dapat dilakukan, tok sahlah nak marah-marah. Lebih baik baca buku dan cari guru serta belajar lebih mendalam mengenai Allah.

Keunikan Malaysia


(Daripada The Malaysian Insider)

Amin Iskandar adalah Pengarah Eksekutif National Institute for Electoral Integrity (NIEI), sebuah badan bukan kerajaan yang aktif dalam program pendidikan pengundi dan pemantauan pilihanraya.

Beliau juga adalah pemilik blog

http://aminiskandar.com

OKT 12 — Malaysia adalah sebuah negara yang unik. Keunikan Malaysia tidak dapat dinafikan oleh mana-mana negara di dunia ini. Selain daripada rakyatnya yang terdiri dari pelbagai agama dan bangsa, Malaysia hanya diperintah oleh satu parti semenjak negara mencapai kemerdekaan pada tahun 1957.

Terbaru, Malaysia sekali lagi melakar sejarah apabila seorang pemimpin yang pernah dijatuhkan hukuman oleh partinya kerana didapati bersalah di atas amalan rasuah politik dipertahankan oleh perdana menteri secara terbuka.

Perdana menteri mempertahankan pemimpin tersebut oleh kerana ingin memastikan partinya memenangi pilihanraya kecil (PRK) di selatan Semenanjung Malaysia setelah berkali-kali parti yang diperintahnya tumpas ketangan pakatan pembangkang dalam PRK.

Untuk menghalalkan tindakan partinya meletakkan pemimpin tersebut sebagai calon PRK, perdana menteri telah mencipta satu istilah baru yang dinamakan “kesalahan teknikal” ataupun “technical offense”.

Kata perdana menteri, kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh pemimpin tersebut hanyalah kesalahan teknikal.

Inilah kehebatan Malaysia.

Di Israel, negara yang paling dibenci oleh rakyat Malaysia dan satu-satunya negara yang tidak dibenarkan oleh passport Malaysia untuk masuk (kerana Malaysia tidak mengiktiraf penubuhan negara Israel dan menyokong perjuangan rakyat Palestin) perdana menterinya, Ehud Olmert terpaksa meletakkan jawatan kerana menghadapi tuduhan rasuah.

Rasuah yang dituduh kepada Ehud Olmert tidaklah sehebat kes PKFZ, akan tetapi beliau tetap meletakkan jawatan kerana ditekan oleh rakyat negara tersebut yang mahukan pemimpin mereka bersih dan kelihatan bersih.

Di Malaysia, apabila laman web Malaysia Today mendedahkan mengenai kertas mesyuarat kabinet berkenaan dengan PKFZ, yang disiasat bukannya isi kandungannya tetapi pihak yang membocorkan kertas mesyuarat tersebut. Begitulah hebatnya Malaysia. Orang yang bersalah tidak disiasat. Yang menjadi mangsa adalah orang yang membocorkan kesalahan tersebut.

Orang Melayu dan Rasuah

Dikalangan rakyat Malaysia, terutamanya bagi orang-orang Melayu yang beragama Islam, rasuah bukanlah satu kesalahan yang besar. Ianya boleh disucikan cukup dengan apabila perlaku rasuah tersebut pergi menunaikan umrah atau naik haji.

Sewaktu saya masih lagi mahasiswa dan pada ketika itu terlibat dengan aktivisme, pernah sekali saya timbulkan isu-isu rasuah pemimpin negara kepada saudara-mara di kampung.

Saya telah dimarah oleh seorang makcik saya yang mengatakan, “Kalau kau jadi perdana menteri pun kau akan ambik jugak. Biarlah pemimpin yang ada sekarang nak ambik sikit!”

Pada ketika itu barulah saya sedar mengapa parti pemerintah mampu terus bertahan walaupun sudah begitu lama berkuasa.

Orang-orang Melayu terutamanya dari generasi sebelum merdeka dan generasi pertama selepas merdeka, memberikan sokongan padu kepada mereka sehinggakan rasuah atau penyelewengan kuasa tidaklah dianggap sebagai satu kesalahan.

Sikap dan pandangan seperti ini bukanlah hanya dimiliki oleh penyokong-penyokong parti pemerintah yang berideologikan “nationalist”, ia turut dikongsi oleh sebahagian penyokong-penyokong parti Islam yang kini telah memerintah beberapa buah negeri selepas pilihanraya umum (PRU) 8 Mac 2008.

Lihatlah selepas 8 Mac 2008. Berapa banyak demonstrasi yang dianjurkan oleh sayap pemuda parti tersebut untuk menentang konsert berbanding dengan menentang rasuah?

Oleh kerana terlalu antikan konsert, mereka turut membantah konsert dari artis yang terlibat membantu pergerakkan hak asasi manusia sedunia seperti Avril Lavingne yang diketahui umum membantu kempen Amnesty International (AI), sebuah pergerakkan hak asasi manusia sedunia untuk membantu kesengsaraan rakyat di Darfur.

Negara “kafir” dan rasuah

Saya pernah menetap di sebuah negara “kafir” yang dinamakan Korea Selatan. Korea Selatan bukanlah asing bagi rakyat Malaysia. Produk-produk seperti Samsung, LG, Kia dan drama seperti “Winter Sonata” kuat dalam ingatan rakyat negara ini.

Dinegara salah satu gergasi ekonomi Asia ini, rasuah adalah satu perkara yang sensitif dan perlakunya akan mengambil tindakan yang ekstrim seperti membunuh diri jika dituduh atau disabitkan dengan kesalahan rasuah.

Pada bulan Mei tahun ini, dunia dikejutkan apabila bekas presiden Korea Selatan, Roh Moo-Hyun membunuh diri akibat daripada tuduhan rasuah terhadap beliau.

Dalam nota yang ditinggalkan sebelum membunuh diri, Roh mengatakan: “I have no face to show to the people. I am sorry for disappointing you.” (“Saya tidak sanggup untuk berhadapan dengan rakyat. Maafkan saya kerana mengecewakan anda.”)

Lihatlah bagaimana pendirian orang Korea mengenai rasuah. Seorang bekas presiden membunuh diri oleh kerana malu untuk berhadapan dengan rakyat apabila dikaitkan dengan rasuah.

Di Malaysia, seorang yang pernah dijatuhkan oleh kerana dibuktikan mengamalkan rasuah masih boleh bertanding dalam pilihanraya dan disokong oleh perdana menteri. Begitulah kehebatan Malaysia yang tiada pada negara lain.

Tidak hairanlah Korea Selatan telah jauh meninggalkan Malaysia. Satu ketika dahulu, Malaysia berdiri lebih tinggi dari Korea Selatan. Kini, rakyat Malaysia terpaksa bergantung dengan produk-produk dari Korea Selatan untuk menjalani kehidupan seharian kerana lebih murah jika dibandingkan dengan produk-produk dari Jepun dan Amerika Syarikat.

Kerana rasuah dan penyelewengan, rakyat Malaysia tidak dapat menikmati perkhidmatan secara percuma dan terpaksa memikul beban hutang yang tinggi sebaik sahaja keluar dari universiti.

Kerana rasuah dan penyelewengan, rakyat Malaysia terpaksa membayar harga minyak yang tinggi walaupun Malaysia adalah negara pengeluar minyak. Kerana harga minyak yang tinggi, rakyat Malaysia terpaksa dibebani dengan kos sara hidup yang tinggi walaupun pendapatan mereka rendah.

Selagi pemikiran majoriti orang-orang Melayu yang beragama Islam tidak berubah terhadap rasuah, selagi itulah rasuah akan berleluasa dalam negara. Selagi itulah pemimpin yang menghadapi pertuduhan rasuah dapat terus bertanding dan menang dalam pilihanraya.

Apabila pemimpin yang pernah disabitkan dengan kesalahan rasuah menang dalam pilihanraya, jangan marahlah jika beliau terus menerus mengamalkan budaya rasuah. Rakyat yang memilih harus dipersalahkan kerana tidak menolak budaya rasuah.

Jika amalan rasuah tidak dibendung dan terus dibiarkan, jangan terkejut jika Malaysia akan terus ketinggalan dan tidak mustahil akan menjadi negara yang terkebelakang.

Petroleum yang selama ini menjadi tunggak kepada kekuatan ekonomi negara akan habis juga satu hari nanti. Jangan apabila ianya menjadi kenyataan, kita akan menyesal kerana pada ketika wang negara masih banyak, kita tidak berbuat apa-apa untuk melawan rasuah.

from Popteevee

The past weekend saw two landmark events in Malaysia’s political landscape: Tan Sri Isa Samad’s whopping win in the Bagan Pinang by-election, and the dramatic MCA EGM which has shaken the very foundations of the party. 

We speak with Amin Iskandar, the Exective Director of the National Institute for Electoral Integrity, about what we can analyse and anticipate from these recent developments. Amin has also just recently returned from observing elections in Afghanistan - we asked him what Malaysia could learn from Afghanistan’s democratic reforms. 


Amin Iskandar is the Exective Director of the National Institute for Electoral Integrity. He is also an activist, a singer-songwriter, a columnist with The Malaysian Insider, and an Asian Public Intellectual.

Two ‘budak Cina’ in a Malay household


(From www.sun2surf.com)


IN this poignant tale that grew out of a eulogy for his late elder brother Say Teik, MARTIN LIM recounts their extraordinary teenage years – two “budak Cina” growing up in a Malay household in Kampung Teluk Wan Jah, Alor Star, and the lessons he learnt that have shaped his life. The story, invested with delightful details, transports us to a gentler era around the time of the declaration of Independence.

THE year was 1955. Alor Star was your typical small town in pre-independent Malaya. Seemingly quiet on the commercial facade, but buzzing with life behind its private residential walls.


Martin Lim

Pekan China was a business street to the Chinese and running parallel to it was Pekan Melayu. This major thoroughfare was, and, still is, lined with a few kopitiam at its south end, and goldsmith shops to the north, ending with the beautiful, classical Masjid Zahir.

The Empire Theatre sat imposingly, across from Pekan Rabu, on the eastern side, while Jalan Langgar on its south, was flanked by a mixture of shops, including the ever-present “chettiars”.

Children, like me, in our respective loyal uniform, brown and white, green and white, white and white, were noisy as we made our way to school. It was not my usual morning, as I walked past my old school, St Michael’s, towards Sultan Abdul Hamid College (SAHC), my new school.

The night before had been eventful. It was close to midnight. My father had fallen very ill. Our step-mother, his third wife, was worried. She asked me to fetch his personal doctor. I did, peddling my Raleigh as fast as my legs would pump, from Lorong Merpati where our small two-bedroom house was through the dark town, zipping by the majestic Balai Besar until, finally, curving in front of the eerie Nobat tower and across to the doctor’s fenced residence in Kampung Baharu.

My yells were unforgettably loud in that midnight quietude. The screams woke him up. Some frantic identification and explanations followed. Satisfied and convinced, he drove to our house. Administered an injection, our father gradually found comfort and drifted to sleep, snoring loudly.

He was breathing abnormally heavy when I left him that morning.

An hour or two later, I was back in the house. My brother, Say Teik, had come by my classroom, and in between sobs, announced that our father had passed away.

Even though my father had only recently been baptised a Catholic, his subsequent funeral and burial, three days later, was in traditional Buddhist, all to the tight-lipped insistence of Lim Eng Hoe, our strict grandfather.

Our paternal great-great-grandfather, Lim Hua Chiam, was a past president of one of the more prestigious Chinese kongsis in Penang at the beginning of the last century.

He was the “pendatang” in our family lineage, the first to emigrate out of Fujian, China, to Malaya.

We only learnt, quite recently, that he might have been instrumental in leading the Hokkiens to fight the Cantonese in a well-documented local communal uprising, sometime during the start of the 20th Century in Penang.

How we ended up living in a Malay household

We were staunch, traditional Chinese, although Peranakan by choice. Babas on our father’s end, Nyonyas on our mother’s. We grew up learning never to stray from our established roots. Inter-racial marriage was a constant no-no reminder.

Skin colour was a segregational determinant in our dating. “Chinese we are and Chinese you will stay!” almost became the family cry.

Therefore, it was a heart-wrenching commotion when our mother, Ooi Ah Ean, divorced our father, converted to Islam and renamed Fatimah binti Abdullah to marry Abdul Rahman bin Shamsuddin, a Malay. As a consequence, she was disowned and ex-communicated in our Chinese family.

Naturally, my brother and I felt threatened. It was an unimaginably difficult situation to place two unfortunate young boys in. However, we somehow survived the ordeal. And, now, three years or so after that traumatic change in our household, my brother and I found ourselves, once again, in a new predicament, the death of a much revered father. How could anybody replace him, let alone a Malay and a Muslim?

It was not easy, to say the least, in view of the racial, cultural, religious, and colour barriers we had grown up with.

Luckily for us, we had spent time with this “pak-tiri” before, on a number of occasions, on school holidays, in Langkawi. He had been posted over there. We had also met and shared many happy days with our step-siblings, Meh and Kak Nab, scaring them with made-up stories of “orang minyak” (oily man).

Some of the preconceived notions we had constructed began to be demolished, unconsciously remoulded and altered because of these earlier contacts. We were both treated with unusual kindness, patience, thoughtful attention, inclusion, trust and non-threatening approaches to our learning and gradual adaptation to a Malay family.

But still, the thought of having to move in with the Malay “Pak-cik”, the new term for us to address our step-father, his Malay children, our “jib-huan” (in Hokkien, a convert) mother, in Teluk Wan Jah, a very Malay kampung, left both of us close to tears, uncertain of our own future.

Moreover, we did not want to risk hurting the vital linkage to our Chinese family either.

Fortunately, when the moment came to move in, Pak-cik was receptively warm and welcoming. He was aware of our teenage plight, confusion, and vulnerability. He quietly made us feel wanted, took time to assure us and more importantly, gave us a lot of personal space to learn, observe, and grow in the new Malay family.

Above all else, he never forced us into Islam. Clearly, here was a man who fervently placed religious choice on a personal level. The Holy Quran, as I remember, was always placed prominently in the glass cabinet in the living room. Respectfully, this was probably our step-father’s way of inviting all of us to inspect its contents. He always made himself easily accessible if we had enquiries.

Learning ‘adat’

Our introduction to Malay customs started with placing our footwear outside the door. Our mother explained that shoes and slippers tended to carry all kinds of unwelcomed dirt, and wearing them into the house would have dirtied the living space.

Moving barefoot in the house also meant we had to keep our feet washed and clean. We found out only too quickly how merciless the household rats could be, sleeping on the floor with unwashed feet. Those nocturnal creatures would nibble our toes until they bled. We would wake up in agony.

Washing is a very essential Malay practice. We familiarised ourselves with the term “najis” (excrement). We washed our hands before a meal. We washed ourselves after using the toilet. We ceased using toilet rolls.

Sarongs now replaced our customary shorts and pajamas when home. We learnt to position the correct designed part of the kain in the back, overlap the front fold and to neatly roll the top down uniformly with measured tightness. Then there was the cultured way of sitting as opposed to, as my mother would put it, the uncivilised way.

“Jangan-lah ‘dok kankang … Lipat-lah kaki hang ‘tu … ‘dok-lah sila,” our mother would drum into us. (“Don’t sit with your legs wide apart. Cross your legs”.)

She would converse in Malay with us; but would use Hokkien frequently too. She was quite adamant about our Malay. “Cakap pun macham ‘apek’. Cuba cakap macam orang Melayu,” she would tease us, even though her own pronunciation, often times, needed our giggling corrections.

(“You both speak like a Chinese ‘uncle’. Try speaking Malay like a Malay.”)

She was right. Respect and amazement usually attend the one who speaks a language foreign to him commandingly.


Lim (standing third from left) and Say Teik (standing fifth from left) with their
step-father Abdul Rahman and mum Ooi Ah Ean (seated in centre) in a
black-and-white family photo that had been hand-coloured.

“Speak English like an English or don’t speak at all,” one past colonial headmaster at the SAHC used to boom at us.

Our mother was no religious slouch either. She did her share of daily observances, went for her pilgrimage and, faithfully continued her Muslim practices until her passing in 1997.

She continued to educate us in Malay manners during our teen years. “Kaki-tu yang bisa sekali,” she used to emphasise. “Kepala pantang sunggoh! “

She said to the Malays, the leg or foot is the most insulting (part of our body), while the head the most esteemed.

Never point your toes at a Malay, or for that matter, at anyone. This is totally unacceptable. I once smacked the outstretched foot of one of my impudent college students, here in the USA, off the front table, much to his consternation, and my resentment.

That was not my normal behaviour. I had felt instinctively insulted. Of course, he was customarily ignorant of his action. I did explain to him, quite elaborately (including a geographical map), the cultural significance of his foot-placement, in Malaysia, a country I had come from.

I would like to think that he learnt a rewarding lesson that day. And, never, never touch nor slap the head, even in jest. As a matter of fact, I recall someone telling me, following a question from me, some 50-odd years ago, as to why Malay men wear the songkok. He told me, in earnest, that it was more of a religious reminder that Allah was that high above the head, notwithstanding that there’s where our brain is also located. I took him at his word, and never thought about authenticating his explanation.

It was my step-father who pointed out to me that the threshold of the front door to a Malay house is quite sacred.

I was sitting in our silent, tidy living room, one hot, humid, stifling afternoon, when a stranger walked up to our front door. He asked, somewhat rudely, to see Abdul Rahman. I went to the back to fetch my step-father. When we entered the front-room, he suddenly let out a fierce yell: “Celaka! Orang ta’ dak adat! Kurang ajar! Keluar dari sini! ” (Person without custom. Poorly brought up. Get out of here.)

With that, he shoved the shocked “guest” out of the door, and slammed the door shut.

When he had calmed down, he explained: “The visitor had it coming. He crossed over the threshold of our front-door. He had done this once before, uninvited. I had warned him, then. It is customary that if you are a guest to a Malay home, you wait outside the threshold to the host’s house, until invited to enter. You never cross it. Failing to do this, you insult the host.”

This is true of many other cultures. He also told me “to wait at the main door until the guests have all departed before shutting it. Do not insult them by closing the door before they have left.”

Even to these days, I still wait at the main entrance to our home, much to the amusement of some of my American guests, waving, until all have completely driven away.

We were also instructed, as a gesture of respect and politeness, to bow with one hand stretched down by the side, in front of people older than us whenever we walk pass close to them. Our mother used to kick our butt playfully, as a reminder, anytime she caught us not doing this. “Tunduk! ” she would order.

When I first arrived in the USA, I remember passing by my daughters’ late maternal grandfather, Fred Voigt, one evening in their home, outside Brownsville, Oregon, when he tugged on my side, and asked why I did that each time I passed by his wife or him.

I explained. He was impressed, but lamented its absence in their American culture.

Our mother continued to be the cultural teacher. She was always reminding us of the Malay proverb, “Biar mati anak, jangan mati adat! ” (The importance of customs and manners in the Malay culture outweigh even the value of one’s child, in a manner of speaking).

She would advise us on how to address various relatives and friends in the kampung – mak-lang, pak-lang, chu-Darus, pak-Mat, mak-Tam, mak-Embon, together with their acceptable protocols in greeting and salutation.

There were days in Kampung Telok Wan Jah, when someone in the neighbourhood would bring a dish of special food to share. Mak-Mah, our mother as she was known by the children, would place some sugar in the clean plate after it was washed and dried. When asked about the sugar, she said it was customary among the Malays to thank the giver by either returning the container with food, or if none was available, a lump of sugar. One never handed back a gift-plate empty.

Our diet at home also changed, in due course. The food we were eating “mutated” and became spicier and spicier. It gradually obliterated the blander food we were accustomed to. The sambal-belacan for our daily ulam intake took on a new mixture of cabai-melaka mixture. Each dish grew “hotter”. So did the curry. It was not good enough unless we slapped our thighs in blistering pain, with every gulp. Only the daun-kadok santan remained cooling to our flaming tongues. The enjoyment by the entire household over our mother’s cooking was close to being festive.

Thankfully, she passed this skill on to our adopted sister, Zaini.

We helped raise and mould her. At the age of three, Anak-ku Sazali, became her signature song. We taught her to sing that. She is now in her early 50’s, happily married to Putra for the past 29 years. They have five children.

When Say Teik, her “bang-Hor”, was dying in the hospital of lung cancer complications, in June, she sat faithfully in vigil, never leaving his side except for prayer, the powder-room, or home for the night. But she would be right back early the following morning, sitting by our brother, shedding her share of tears. That’s dedication and love.

Memories of ‘berkhatan’ ceremony

The Hari Raya celebrations and the performing of the puberty rites, known as the sunat or berkhatan (circumcision) are probably the two most anticipated occasions in a Malay boy’s life. Lighting the oil-lamps to mark a path to the house and spreading them on wooden posts around the house was as exciting and memorable as the sumptuous, colourful array of kueh-mueh (dessert) on all the clothed tables.

The puberty rites of my two step-brothers Fuad and Feisol remain etched in my mind. There’s the long yellowish looking banana-tree trunk lying in the living-room, close to the kitchen entrance. The Tok-Mudin from the local madrasah and his assistant sat on opposite sides of the trunk. In between them were what looked like two bamboo skewers, the size of regular chop-sticks.

These stayed implanted, menacingly, in the shape of an ‘X’, into the trunk. There were only a few of us privileged witnesses present. The prayers began. Twelve-year-old Fuad, one year younger than his brother, Feisol, was led, gingerly, from the kitchen by the Tok-Mudin’s helper to the appointed spot.


Lim (second from left) and his late brother Say Teik (third from left) at the
wedding of their nephew Zaid Fitri Abdul Rahman Putra and Erma Farizan in
2007, accompanied by Say Teik’s family members.

Fuad, covered only in a fresh white sheet of light-weight cotton cloth around his waist, knelt nervously on the man’s instruction, close to where the two sticks stood waiting, stuck on the trunk. The pious man continued reciting Quranic verses, as he subtly reached out for the young man’s prepuce, pulling it through the opening made by the straddling bamboo. The skewers were, then, pushed down quickly, over the foreskin, until they held it tightly in place.

Anticipation was written all over Fuad’s face. More, quicker verses followed, and, at hardly the blink of an eye, the Tok-Mudin, tugging on the extended epidermis with his left fingers and thumb, lopped it off with the small, sharp scalpel he had been holding in his right hand out of sight all this time. It was over. The boy became a man. He did not cry. He merely winced in momentary pain. Feisol’s turn came the year after.

Our choice

Say Teik and I lived with our Malay family until the end of 1959. By then, the Malay neighbours had grown accustomed to the two “budak Cina” in their midst. You could say they eventually, adopted us, and finally, made us one of their own, jokingly but fondly, nicknaming my brother, Yusof, and me, Halim.

Meanwhile, we kept our visits to our Chinese family, as often as permissible. That was important to us. It would be disingenuous of me if I failed to indicate here, that while we were growing up in the Malay house, the Chinese relatives of ours in Penang never interfered but never ceased to monitor our daily well-being either.

It is important to point out also, that it never occurred to us that we had to accept the living situation then, because the alternative was worse. We had an uncle, our father’s older brother, in Penang, and cousins to boot, who would have willingly taken us in. We had a choice.

I left for Brinsford-Lodge, England, in December 1959. My elder brother departed for training in the Health Ministry. I returned after two years and began teaching at SAHC, my alma mater. My brother completed his training, and was appointed a full-fledged health-inspector. He and Wong Foong Moi, a Seremban girl, also a health nurse, tied the knot in 1964. I was his best man.

I stayed on for two more years in the Telok Wan Jah home after returning from England, before moving into the SAHC hostel as one of the hostel-masters. I married a Peace Corps volunteer, Joan L. Voigt, in 1966, and migrated to the US at the end of that year.

The bigger picture

Two Chinese, living as Malays, with Malays, among Malays. Is there a bigger picture to be seen in all this? Possibly.

Other than the usual sibling rivalry, and suspicion among step-children, one begins to accept the idea, very quickly, that the real trick in getting along with people different from yourself, is not so much in your differences, but in your similarities, such as sharing common needs and working together to achieve those needs. Living with identical problems, and solving those problems, together.

Solutions must be based on the merits of total honesty, integrity, fairness and equity.

If it’s within a family, then the unity, security and success of that whole family become its overall consideration, not just the individuals in it.

Our own experience in co-living taught us to be cautious when making judgmental calls. All may not be what it seems.

Initially, my brother and I had to consciously suppress our innate and cultivated fear. Fear that we will be forced to convert our religious belief was foremost on our mind. Many well-meaning friends and relatives would shake their fingers at us as in warning as they voiced their suspicions to us. Time went by. What we feared did not materialise. Our uneasiness was allayed. We were encouraged. Our step-father became our trusted mentor. Mistrust, as we are well aware of, can be so insidious.

Pak-cik’s no-nonsense honesty, together with his ever-positive outlook, gave us ample reasons to emulate him in many ways, so that all those misgivings and warnings we had been hearing, quietly dissipated.

In the absence of those two formidable walls – fear and mistrust – we were able to verify the real condition ourselves. We grew more adventurous. We found ourselves more open to learning and instructing. The kampung folk reciprocated, in turn. With new confidence, we started to visit the different neighbours in their homes more frequently, putting to use what we had learnt at home, the greeting, the bowing, the proper sitting position, the polite invitation before drinking or eating, until the final leaving.

We played with the boisterous children in the village, and, before too long, our spoken Malay improved. We began to speak Malay more like Malays. This was particularly important to me. Its fluency allowed me to blend into the family and community, provoking a sense of belonging. In exchange, we shared our Chinese background and practices, when asked by the curious, translating a host of everyday Malay usage into Hokkien.

As we settled in and grew more comfortable with ourselves, we realised that much of what we had been told in our previous “pre-Malay” period, were hearsays, innuendos, rumours, generalisations, passed down.

It would however be utterly naïve of me to pontificate that even though our personal observations dismissed a good amount of the negative assumptions we had heard in the past, that life in our kampung home was all peachy.

On the contrary, we had our fill of family “pecking” orders, including your everyday dissent and dissatisfaction. Every community comes with its share of builders and demolishers. People who either help garner the general good of the group or cause its demise. The Malays are no exception.

But it would be wrong to suggest that they are generally lazy, inefficient, unintelligent, manipulative, corrupt, non-ambitious, “earth-diggers”. Their own achievements through the years are testimonies to their prowess.

Within the scale of the kampung children I grew up with, there’s Din-garu, who went to work without shirking; Umak-siam, who, feeling obligated one day, enlisted in the army, and left our kampung, to fight in the Congo; Kassim, Mak-Tam’s younger son, ended up a general in the army. My step-sister, Kak Nab retired a teacher, was herself Kirkby-trained. My step-brother, Feisol, academically successful in SAHC, was awarded a scholarship, went to Dublin, graduated from one of its fine universities, returned home, and has been doing very well ever since.

Our cousin-sister, Jumaah, is a lawyer by profession. Loyal to both her Malay and Chinese relatives, she is one highly motivated Datin. These are all very genuine, ordinary folk out of one small, insignificant kampung, taking on what some might consider quite extraordinary feats. They reached their positions and goals, despite their race, not because of it.

Our dear old childhood friends, Syed Salem Albukhary, whose nomadic ancestors walked “the vast region comprising lands of Jazira al-Arab right through the sky-piercing ranges of Central and South-Asia”, and Wan Ahmad Sobri Wan Tajuddin of humble Acheh-mix, come immediately to mind, as other figures whom this incredible category of high-achievers with very modest beginning, fit.

Fully aware of the ramifications, the people I am familiar with had to work even harder to prove their mental and professional worth. I had to do the same here in the US. I had to slog to maintain a high GPA (grade point average, academic achievement grade) throughout my university study, to convince the local folk (with their own racial bias, very pronounced at that time), that one’s skin colour, looks, or race does not ultimately determine the measure of his intellect or personal character.

Generally, speaking, I see no glaring difference, growing up as a Chinese in a Chinese home, as opposed to a Malay one. Apart from their respective moral bearing, cultural cloak and religious conviction, both could be as ambitious, disciplined, capable, inventive, purposeful, patriotic, and fiercely competitive, given the appropriate equity, fairness, incentives, hope, aspirations and opportunities.

Within the confines of the family-building, there is no special treatment accorded to one member, and not the other; no extra share of the fortune or loss; no more chances than another; no more burden to one, and not the other; no one-sided reward; no lopsided punishment.

Since all have equal stakes in its success, all should have equal or equitable opportunities and responsibilities. The family head must lead inclusively, not exclusively.

The true culprits lie in oneself, our arrogance, our unwillingness, our close-mindedness, our envy, our jealousy, our selfishness, our convoluted bias, and our fears.

Race has very little to do with it.

Martin Lim Say Leong resides in the United States where he teaches. He still “balik kampung” whenever he finds the time.

We, the People, will take charge, thank you


From sayaanakbangsamalaysia.net

Written by straits-mongrel

fff-vr1-skAnd the young are apathetic? If you think so, dwell on in your cave.

Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia held a voter registration exercise at the Freedom Film Fest and came away a little breathless from the event. Seven out of 10 people above 21 years old were already registered voters. As for the rest who didn’t, a large majority emphatically agreed to get onto the electoral roll. Many of them were youths in their twenties.

Sure, there were those who argued for their right NOT to register to vote. “Because I don’t care,” said one. Well-lll okay…

The Freedom Film Fest, organised by KOMAS, was held at the Annexe Gallery, KL over the weekend. It was the first leg of the festival, which will also be hosted in Penang, Kuching and JB. Altogether 23 short films were shown and the event drew a wide section of the masyarakat.

fff-vr2

With this sheet, you hereby take charge: SABM’s Moh Foong passes over the copy of the voter’s registration form to the latest true-blue stakeholder of the country. May she wield her power well.

fff-vr3-sk

And if you didn’t know perhaps it’s time you did - KOMAS is one cool outfit that’s been doing great work on community integration in this country. They ran the event well, had tonnes of material available for the audience, and brought together a host of like-minded groups to promote their causes. We’re proud to have been a guest.

Events like this, and the subsequent response from the younger public, only prove that Malaysia’s civil society has nowhere to go but up.

PopIN : Budaya Pop bertemu Sosio Politik


Sektor bisnes inovatif kini banyak menawarkan peluang-peluang mengembangkan perniagaan melalui pelbagai laman rangkaian sosial seperti Facebook dan Twitter dengan kos yang amat rendah. Persaingan yang wujud adalah berdasarkan atas nilai sebenar yang ditawarkan kepada sesebuah komuniti.

Memperlihatkan perkembangan terbaru ini, Yayasan .myFuture bersama-sama dengan Popfolio (pencipta PopTeeVee) telah menjadi rakan kongsi pintar bagi menngambil peluang membina satu rangkaian berita bagi golongan belia Malaysia, tanpa menggunakan banyak tenaga serta kos membina sebuah laman web atau laman carian berita.

PopIN (www.pop.in.my) akan menggunakan laman rangkaian sosial untuk membina satu rangkaian berita yang mempunyai pelbagai subjek. Para pengguna akan berkongsi pendapat dan idea menerusi paparan di laman-laman seperti Facebook dan Twitter. Matlamatnya ialah bagi menyebarkan pengisian berinformasi dan menambah nilai pada perbualan menerusi Internet.

Konsep PopIN ini sebenarnya mudah. Kita akan cuba mendapatkan penyertaan belia menggunakan budaya pop untuk menyebarkan subjek sosio-politik menerusi Internet. Bagi menjalankannya, PopIN telah menyediakan projek-projek yang mempunyai objektif masing-masing. Dinamik, seperti juga golongan belia, projek-projek ini akan diubah mengikut selera dan keperluan mereka. Apabila tiba masanya, projek-projek ini boleh dijalankan di luar sebagai susulan. Antara aktiviti-aktiviti luar yang dirancang termasuklah Program Pengundi dan Forum Demokrasi.


Antara projek-projek yang sedang dijalankan oleh PopIN terkini ialah:

Pop Muda Blogger Jemputan

Seorang ikon belia Malaysia yang kreatif, kritikal dan inovatif akan dipilih sebagai blogger jemputan mingguan. PopIN telah pun memaparkan pembuat filem Liew Seng Tat, Shahnon Shah, Michele Gunaselan, Fahmi Reza dan akan datang, Zahiril Adzim, penyanyi Yuna, Nicol David, Hannah Yeoh dan ramai lagi. Blogger jemputan ini akan menulis setiap hari di PopIN selama 5 hari termasuklah paparan klip video, foto, nota, artikel dan sebagainya mengenai sesuatu subjek yang mereka suka.

Pop Muda Twitterviews

Susulan daripada paparan-paparan blogger jemputan, mereka akan ditemuramah menggunakan platform Twitter di mana setiap transkrip akan dapat di baca oleh pengikut-pengikut PopIN secara langsung.

MP 3

Ini merupakan projek menarik PopIN. Ia memaparkan Ahli-ahli Parlimen serta ahli-ahli politik terpilih daripada Kerajaan dan Pembangkang. Setiap daripada mereka akan diperdengarkan 3 buah lagu dan diminta memberi satu ulasan, pendapat dan bagaimana lagu-lagu itu mempunyai hubung kait dengan kehidupan dan pekerjaan mereka. PopIN telahpun memaparkan Nurul Izzah dan ia terbukti popular di kalangan pengikut. Yang terbaru menampilkan, Dr. Dzulkefly Ahmad yang katanya suka dengan lagu Michael Learns to Rock.

Selain daripada projek-projek spesifik tersebut, PopIN juga memaparkan pengisian yang telah dibahagikan kepada beberapa kategori termasuklah,
- berita terkini, pendapat dan analisis mengenai isu-isu sosio-politik semasa Malaysia
- OLD but GOLD - pautan, artikel dan bahan-bahan yang dari tahun-tahun terdahulu tetapi masih lagi relevan pada masa ini.
- Playlist PopIN - memaparkan kumpulan musik dan penyanyi serta penulis lagu
- Sejarah untuk Esok - hampir serupa dengan rancangan televisyen Hari ini Dalam Sejarah, tetapi diubahsuai sedikit bagi membuktikan bahawa sejarah akan berulang dan berguna di masa hadapan.

Sejak bermula pada awal Ogos, PopIN telah menarik minat lebih daripada 3000 pengikut, di mana kebanyakan mereka berumur antara 18 hingga 24 tahun. Mereka merupakan generasi pengundi-pengundi muda di negara kita yang berupaya menentukan perubahan dan hala tuju Malaysia kelak. Ini juga menunjukkan bahawa generasi belia kini tidak lagi bersifat tidak ambil tahu tetapi inginkan informasi dan berita sosio-politik yang independen melalui Internet. Ia merupakan satu petanda betapa matangnya golongan belia di Malaysia kini.

PopIN boleh diakses menerusi www.popin.my. Di sana, anda boleh pilih laman rangkaian sosial daripada Facebook, Twitter, MySpace atau Friendster. Ianya adalah PERCUMA dan segala informasi dan berita terkini akan dihantar kepada kepada anda setiap minit, 24 jam sehari, 7 hari seminggu.

Jumpa anda di sana!